Free quote
Including an airspace check for anything aerial.
Under US copyright law the photographer owns the images unless there is a written assignment. So we write down exactly what you get — a licence with its scope, or an assignment — before the shoot rather than after you try to use them.
Airspace and image rights are both resolved in writing before a camera comes out.
Immersive 360 tours of interiors and spaces, delivered as a navigable walkthrough.
See the programInterior and exterior stills for listings, hospitality and commercial use.
See the programAerial stills and video, flown under a valid remote pilot certificate.
See the programShort-form and listing video, licensed for defined use.
See the programCheck airspace before quoting, fly only under a valid certificate and authorization, state image rights in writing before the shoot, obtain releases where people appear, and refuse edits that would misrepresent a property.
Including an airspace check for anything aerial.
Licence scope and term, or an assignment, agreed first.
Or stood down, if conditions or airspace say so.
So nobody is guessing what they may use.
Quoted per shoot or per property. Airspace authorization, where required, is obtained before the shoot and may affect timing.
Stills, a tour, or both, for one property.
Regular shoots for an agency or business.
Said plainly, because it protects you too.
Every engagement is quoted after a free consultation. No subscription.
DN360VISUALS LLC is a Florida limited liability company with document number L19000222521 on public record with the Florida Division of Corporations, formed in 2019. The work is 360 virtual tours, interior and exterior photography, video, and aerial imagery for real estate, hospitality and commercial clients.
Two things get settled before a shoot. Aerial work for commercial purposes requires an FAA remote pilot certificate, registered aircraft, Remote ID and, in controlled airspace, authorization obtained in advance; we fly certificated or not at all, and a client should know that commissioning an uncertificated operator creates exposure for them as well. And under US copyright law the photographer owns the images from the moment of creation unless there is a written assignment or a written work-made-for-hire agreement — so paying for a shoot does not, by itself, give a client the right to use the images however they wish. We state the licence scope, term, territory and media, or the assignment, before work begins. We also decline edits that would misrepresent a property.
Not automatically, no, and this surprises almost everyone. Under US copyright law the author owns the copyright from creation, and it passes to a client only by written assignment or under a written work-made-for-hire agreement. What you usually get is a licence. We write down the scope, term, territory and permitted media before the shoot, so you know exactly what you may do with the images.
Only if we hold a valid certificate for it and, in controlled airspace, authorization has been obtained. Commercial drone operation requires a Part 107 remote pilot certificate, registration and Remote ID. If authorization has not come through we will not fly, because an unlawful flight also creates exposure for the person who commissioned it, and the imagery may be unusable.
Colour and exposure, yes. Removing structural features, deleting a pole, replacing a view or compositing a sky and presenting it as the actual outlook, no. Those edits misrepresent the property, can breach listing service rules, and tend to surface at the viewing. Virtual staging we will do and we will label it as virtual staging.
Only if the licence covers it, which is exactly why we write the scope down. Third party use, including a portal, franchisor or network, is a common point of friction because the client reasonably assumed a single fee covered everything. Tell us at the quoting stage where the material will end up and we will scope the licence for it.
It can be. Where identifiable individuals appear we obtain a release or we do not include them, and for interiors we need the authority of whoever is entitled to give it. Tenants in occupation are the usual complication, and it is better handled before the shoot than by cropping afterwards.
We will try and we may stand down. For aerial work, weather, airspace and proximity to people are safety and legal constraints rather than preferences, and the decision not to fly is not negotiable against a schedule. We would rather reschedule than produce something while cutting a corner that matters.
A free quote, including an airspace check for anything aerial.